Survival Manual

           The prisoner's dilemma is a model that is testing the lack of altruism existing in society. Its in our human nature always wanting more. Greed and the temptation to succeed are a part of our society today, even if your success means the failure of someone else. This model suits best the interactions between animals (reciprocal altruism, hunting, hiding etc.) because their emotions and lives in general are not as complex as ours. Although the model fits animals behaviors better that doesn't mean it doesn't resemble our own selfish behaviors. 

             An example of this is when people are in business. Businessman A proposes and idea  to the other business partners B, C and D. He obviously makes this proposal simply because he knows alone he won't be as successful as he will be with the other business men. People are generally  afraid of making mistakes, but the part they fear the most is taking the blame for those mistakes. Having other partners, in the case of a business, takes away the blame of a mistake  from YOU and puts it in the shoulders of not only businessman A but also B, C, and D. Sometimes this is comforting for people. Back to the point.. When YOU enter to business YOU want investors so that YOU can succeed and accomplish what YOU want. Sometime these investors are suckers because they may invest all their money and then they don't receive anything in return or not as much money as they first invested losing their profit and their investment. 

              Something that happened in the world not long ago was the Pyramid Scandal. In Colombia one of the major "pyramids" was called the DMG led by David Murcia Gomez with the help of others. As a very smart cheater he would convince some suckers to invest in the pyramids so that they could make a profit from their investment. The first two groups of suckers would get back all their money and much more, so when people saw that the pyramids were a good investment more and more suckers would invest trusting they would have the same destiny as the other suckers. It was a very good business because they would invest what they had and sometimes even triplicate the value of what they invested in the first place. Where did all the money come form? From all of the people who had invested, the problem with this was that there was one point when the money wouldn't be enough to repay what the suckers had invested so they eventually lost everything turning into grudgers. 

                In class we played a game that in a way demonstrated how the grudgers, the cheaters and the suckers interact just to benefit or to harm the others. If both of the students would defect they would get -0.1 so it wasn't convenient. If one defected and the other was a sucker and cooperated then the sucker would get 0 and the chatter would get 0.5 points, in this case it was convenient for the defect or the cheater but not for the sucker. Last, if both were suckers and cooperated they would both receive 0.3 points, this would benefit both but for some people that is not enough. What i noticed in class is that we are all grudgers, once someone gives us their back we do the same to them for revenge. Suckers i think are naive because most of the people wanted more points so they would be defect. Once one person say the opponent was playing defect they would start playing defect so that they wouldn't help the other win more points. I think the best strategy if you play the game for five rounds would be cooperating three times the other two the opponent would be defect and the other player cooperate and the fifth time it should be the other way around.

          What I realized from this activity is that the world is full of people that are not satisfied with what they have and with what they get so they always want more. There are very few people that don't have that mentality and that is very sad. How did society become this way? Why does the world have to be so competitive? This goes back to what Dawkins talked about at the beginning, it is all because of natural selection. We are all survival machines and what i think he means is that we do anything at our reach to survive even if that means not letting others survive or get your same equal opportunities. 

Paradoxical Altruism

One of the major topics in the book The Selfish Gene is how living organism are not honest in a way. this book is a paradox, it contradicts nature and societies' behaviors. He says people and animals are altruistic, but then contradicts that saying that every generous act humans or animals do is to get something in return. Some of the terms he uses to describe and support his theories are:

Benefits of a selfish individual: 

1. Reciprocal altruism:

"you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours"(166)

What Dawkins means by this is that animals have altruistic behaviors when they benefit their selves from it. This theory kind of resembles hypocrisy because people act a certain way not because they want to but because they find it necessary for their well being. An example of this behavior seen in our society today is the social pyramid. Some people are so desperate of becoming "popular", which is ironic because popularity doesn't mean you have true friends. Generally being popular is having fake people around you who are with you for convenience-selfish matters. Ok.. Back to the point, what i mean by this is people are trying to "succeed" socially and to achieve this they do everything at their reach like for example (cough) acting in an altruistic way (cough).  

2. Geometry for the selfish herd: 

"herd of selfish individuals"

This were the papers where W.D. Hamilton in which he stated his theory about how animals stick in with their herds to get a benefit from it. For example when a pack of lions or hyenas go hunting it is better to go in a group because the prey they catch is bigger and they are nor vulnerable to other dangers because they are in groups. This also happens in society, some people are afraid or feel vulnerable when they are alone. An example of a situation like this is when a person is being bullied. Bullies tend to attack their victims when they are alone so when their victims are in groups they don't attack them because the victim has its group to defend him/her.

The next three strategies are part of the "prisoners dilemma" whereas the temptation of having the chance to succeed out of the failure of someone else is greater than simply being equally successful or being a failure. These behaviors are unconscious and are controlled by our genes according to Maynard Smith.

3. Sucker:

suckers are those who  are willing to please everyone who is in need. Usually in real life the suckers don't succeed, they give so much without receiving that they end up with nothing. The problem is not when there are several suckers, but when there are suckers, cheaters and grudgers. The world is full of competition and everyday we see people taking advantage of the weaknesses of others. 

4. Grudger: 

Grudgers are those who keep resentment against the cheaters. They may be suckers and they give something away expecting to get something  in return, but instead they are cheated, left with nothing but bitterness. This happens many times in real life, especially in business. Some people are not to trust and so once they show you they are not reliable you immediately become bitter and stop doing businesses with those who show you they are not honest or trustworthy. Society becomes a paranoid and individualistic, since no one can trust each other.

5. Cheater: 

Cheaters receive from the suckers but don't give in return for their altruistic behavior. Usually the cheaters have a greater opportunity of succeeding in life and this is why each time more suckers and more people want to be just like the cheaters. They receive everything they want and don't have to give anything aways.

Religion's DNA

        Recently we started reading Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene, its plot is based around evolution. Not only scientific evolution but change in our knowledge. His way of writing is arrogant, he expects the reader to know most if not all the biology terms present in the book. Dawkins uses analogies to somehow explain scientific terms or events in evolution, but only he understands them. This book is almost as having biology all over again but with a bad teacher. The Selfish Gene is also a psychological study, it tries to understand why living organisms or survival machines as he calls us are altruistic.

       Through this book Dawkins is clearly trying to transmit a message that criticizes religion and society today and in the past. He contradicts religion with scientific evidence. "It is no good taking the right number of atoms and shaking them together with some external energy till they happen to fall into the right pattern, and out drops Adam."(14) Adam is a biblical character created by god put in the garden of eden where he was given everything, even Eve a women born from his flesh. Dawkins is criticizing how religion simplifies the truth. The creation of a human being is as complex as it could get, the process of meiosis during reproduction, the division of cells, the distribution of the 23 chromosomes from one parent and the 23 from the other, the fight between the dominant and the recessive alleles etc. The point is that the process is long and complex and religion prefers to say that a superior being created Adam, a perfect human being out of the blue. The message he tries to transmit  is that society is very naive, they stick to a believe that somehow isolates them from reality and the true complexity of the world.   

 
       Another example of Dawkins' critics is when he is talking about transcription, the process by which RNA molecules are produced by copying a part of the nucleotide sequence of DNA.  In other words it is when the RNA polymerase copies and translates the DNA strand into and RNA strand. If a mistake is made it can cause a lot of damage, it generates a mutation. According to Dawkins mutations can and have happened in society and cause great damage and controversy. His example is of the Septuagint  ("A Greek version of the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament), including the Apocrypha, made for Greek-speaking Jews in Egypt in the 3rd and 2nd centuries bc and adopted by the early Christian Churches"). "They mistranslated the Hebrew word for "young woman" into the greek word for "virgin", coming up with the prophecy:"Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son.." How could this be possible? All this time we could say people have been deceived, because what they thought was a miracle turned out to be a fraud. Many people still don't know this, I didn't know until I read this book  but this misconception could lead to huge controversy amongst the people all around the world. A simple mistake can cause "mutations" in society.     

The Fragility of Memory

Cities are like dreams,

Everything imaginable can be dreamed,

But every dream conceals a desire. Or a fear.

Cities are the work of the mind, they can't share their first delight more than once,

They only know departures not returns.

Perhaps these cities exist only in the shadow of our lowered eyelids,

Because memory is redundant and nothing but a zodiac of the mind's phantasms.

Contemplating with fascination their own absence, memory's images,

once fixed in words are erased.

When in life the dead outnumbered the living we reconstruct fragments of a fortress of indestructible leftovers.

Swaying through calendars of bygone years, withered flowers, submerging one in its own past.

Objects shifting within a given space,

Leaping from alive to dead less abruptly.

The inferno of the living lives in their past.

Word Puzzle

Here are some vocab words..

1. "A cataclysm will flatten the sordid mountain range, canceling every trace of the metropolis always dressed in new clothes."(116)

Cataclysm: A violent upheaval that causes great destruction or brings about a fundamental change or a change in earth's crust.

2. "Still, at the zenith of Beersheba there gravitates a celestial body that shines with all the city's riches..."(112)

Zenith: the point on the celestial sphere vertically above a given position or observer or the

 highest point or state; culmination.

3. "Despite its pride in its new wealth, the city, at heart, felt itself incongruous, alien, a usurper."(107)

Incongruous: 1. Lacking in harmony; incompatible: a joke that was incongruous with polite conversation.

2. Not in agreement, as with principles; inconsistent: a plan incongruous with reason.

3. Not in keeping with what is correct, proper, or logical; inappropriate: incongruous behavior.

4. "Nothing of the city touches the earth except those long flamingo legs on which it rests and, when the days are sunny, a pierced, angular shadow that falls on the

foliage" (77)

Foliage: it means leafless branches.

5. "Lares of illustrious, but decaying palaces, full of hauteur, or with Lares from tin shacks, susceptible and distrustful."(79)

Hauteur: haughty (arrogantly superior) manner or spirit; arrogance.

6. "Extendind his beringed hand from beneath the silken canopy of the imperial barge, to point to the bridges arching over the canals" (85)

Barge: ark, or boat.

7. "Bridges and canals, each other different from the others: cambered, covered, on pillars, on barges, suspended, with tracery balustrades." (90)

Cambered: to arch slightly; bend or curve upward in the middle.

Balustrades: a railing with supporting balusters

8. "And what a variety of windows looks down on the streets: mulllioned, moorish, lancet, pointed, surmounted by lunettes or stained-glass roses.."(90)

Mullioned: A vertical member, as of stone or wood, dividing a window or other opening.

9. Moorish: spanish architecture characterized by the horseshoe arch and ornate decoration.

10. Lancet: a tall narrow window set in a lancet arch (narrow and pointed)

11. Lunettes: a small circular or crescent-shaped opening in a vaulted roof.

12. "That I conjured up, through its name: Euphrasia, Odile, Margarita, Getullia." (92)

Conjured: to imagine, picture.

13. "On the dock the sailor who caught the rope and tied it to the bollard resembled a man who had soldiered with me and was dead" (94)

Bollard: a thick post on a ship or wharf, used to secure topes and hawsers.

14. "In a repetition that can be followed throughout the whole woof." (96)

Woof: the textures of a fabric.

Dig a Little Deeper

As I kept reading I realized all the names of the cities are feminine. Why is this? What made Calvino chose those particular names? Is there a meaning behind each name?

Olivia:

Olivia is a biblical name that comes from the olive tree. “The olive tree is a symbol of fruitfulness, beauty and dignity”. http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/0/Olivias. In the book Olivia is describes as  “a city rich in products and in profits” (61). Marco Polo describes it as prosperous “prosperity only by speaking of filigree palace with fringed cushions on the seats by the mullioned windows.” (61) The meaning of the name Olivia perfectly fits the description of the city. Its “free life and refined civilization” (61) make the city seem beautiful and sophisticated. I think this name is given to the city because it describes in a way the greatest attributes the city has.  

Sophronia:

 The origin of the name  Sophronia is greek, it means wise, prudent and self-controlled. http://babynamesworld.parentsconnect.com/meaning_of_Sophronia.html. In the book this city is made up of “two half-cities” (63). The cities are organized and divided in a particular way. In one half of the city is like a circus, representing the wild side. The other half has the bank, the school and everything that is indispensable in a society to keep it organized. “one of the half-cities is permanent, the other is temporary… take it off, transplanting it to the vacant lots of another half-city”(63). One half of the city is just like a circus it is temporary and once the “sojourn” is over the circus moves away into another city. I think Calvino chose this particular name because the city is divided in a way that it can be controlled. It is organized and that is one of the words that define Sophronia the name.   

Eutropia:

Eutropia has an old Greek origin as well, but the meaning of it is well mannered and fair. http://www.babynamespedia.com/meaning/Eutropia. In the chapter about Eutropia Calvino mentions Mercury, a mythological character also known as the god of trade and travel. The city of Eutropia was known for its inhabitants, which moved whenever their life got monotonous and they became weary. I can’t find a connection between the description of the city and the name of it but ill think about it for future blogs.

Zemrude: I couldn’t find the meaning of this name. The city on the other hand does have a meaning, the beauty of the city lies on the eyes of the beholder. According to your mood and to your vision the city will be either beautiful or horrendous.

Aglaura: I couldn’t find the meaning of this name either, but the city is a colorless city. I think the cities and names are the cities in which there is no language or words are insufficient to describe the city. 

Cities and...

Why are the cities classified with those titles? From what I've seen each title represents criticism of society and what humanity has become.

The book criticizes how people are never satisfied with what they have, so they either pretend they have it or "the traveler recognizes the little that is his, discovering the much he has not had and will never have " (29).  People are never happy. They may have all the money in the world or all they always desired but they still want more. It happens in all aspects of life, not only with material belongings but with literally genetic belongings. It’s sad to see how unthankful people are and how the world has become a place where desire goes beyond necessity. 

Cities and desires:

"In every age someone, looking at Fedora as it was, imagined a way of making it the ideal city.." (32) People are not pleased with what they have, most people are seeking their utopia, but does it exist?  Cities and desires remind me of the song imagine by John Lenon. People always desire to find a perfect world. The ideal world varies according to the perceptive of what the ideal life is for people. Unfortunately we have grown with the mentality that perfection is tangible and achievable when in reality it is not. We think perfection is attainable and therefore become lost in dreams that reflect our deepest desires.

Cities and memories:

I think the cities in these chapters are indirectly criticizing how people live in regrets. People are always thinking about the possible outcomes of their actions and once they make one decision they go back to the past and try to decipher what could have happened if they had gone the other way. People have a plethora of images from the past. We are constantly trying to recreate those images to keep the memory vivid. The truth is that our memory distorts the reality and may keep us with remorse.

Trading Cities:

The purpose of these cities in the book is to evaluate how society has become so superficial. Communications between people has become shallow. People are so concerned about their past they stop living their present and forget about their future. They leave people and thing from their present behind and get lost in their memory. Most of our society today is so self centered that they only think about themselves and they don't "trade" anything useful the worlds traded are plain and meaningless.

Cities and Signs:

“Each man bears in his mind a city made only of differences, a city without figures, without form, and the individual cities fill it up.” (34) Each city has different signs and characteristics that make it unique, but people always want what the others have. The image of perfection comes from trends. What seems perfect today will definitely not be perfect tomorrow or might have not been perfect in the past. The cities in Cities and Signs are trying to show how people create their destiny. They create and mold their past and their present according to what they want.

Thin Cities:

“Years and changes continue to give their form to desires, and those in which desires either erase the city or are erased by it.” (35) People are doomed to temptation. Changes come with time and with both discontent and contentment. Unhappiness reins the world because no one is satisfied with what they have. People always want more. What thin cities talk about or criticize is how people always want what their “neighbor has”, people are in a way in scaffolds or in “platforms and balconies placed on stilts at various heights, crossing one another” (35) If they take the wrong step they fall, and people are so scared of falling that they dream about change but never take the risk to make it happen. Thin Cities show the fear and the desire people have. Which weighs more?

“With cities, it is as with dreams: everything imaginable can be dreamed, but even the most unexpected dream is rebus that conceals a desire or, its reverse, a fear” (44)

Calvino's Imagination

       Italo Calvino’s Invisible Cities, is a book about Marco Polo’s voyages and Kublai Khan the Mongolian emperor and grandson of Genghis Khan. The plot of the book is what is italicized. The rest of the chapters are like short stories. They don’t seem to relate, they are short, concise and very detailed.

Before starting the book I became a detective. I was trying to decipher the meaning  the pattern of chapters had, looking for a clue word I guess that would make the book meaningful. I wrote down on a piece of paper each chapter’s title: Cities and Memories, Cities and Desires, Cities and Signs, and finally Thin Cities. I listed the name of the city in each chapter and the number of the chapter. I thought maybe D.I.Z.Z D.A.D T.Z. I. (initials of the city names) would actually mean something. I realized it meant nothing. But then I thought… Why were the chapters arranged in that particular order? Does it mean anything?

I usually never read the summary in the back of a book so that I don’t ruin the story. This time I did. I just felt it would help me understand. Before, I asked myself: what does the author mean by INVISIBLE? My first assumption was that by invisible the author meant imaginary, nonexistent. As I read the summary I was surprised with something I read. "Soon it becomes clear that each of these fantastic places is really the same place". How could this be possible? All the descriptions of the cities are completely different, they even have different names. Then I realized maybe my inference was true. Maybe these cities are imaginary. While I was reading the pages we had to I found evidence to support my idea.

“Memory is redundant: it repeats signs so that the city can begin to exist.” (19)

        By this the author means that memory is not needed because it only reproduces images and symbols from the past. This is evidence that by invisible Calvino means imaginary. Memory keeps images alive but it also creates and distorts reality. While you may try to remember something exactly as it is, the recreation is not exact therefore you are imagining and inventing things that aren’t actually what the place or object is like in reality. Unless you have a photographic memory it’s not possible to recreate something by memory exactly as it is.     

“Perhaps, Kublai thought, the empire is nothing but a zodiac of the mind’s phantasms.” (22)

        This is another piece of evidence. The zodiac is based on imaginary stars that “affect” your behavior and your character, it is not real but people believe in it. When Calvino uses this phrase he is saying that Kublai thought that the empire was just pure imagination, it was a recreation of the mind. What the travelers told him about their journeys was a false creation, was based on useless memory, it was not real.

Vocabulary: Phantasms: something that you imagine you see but that is not real.

The Garden of Eden

What is life? People are constantly trying to find a utopia but I'm sorry to break your bubble guys, there's no such thing as it. Perfection is non existant, what might seem perfect to someone might not be to others so nothing will ever be perfect for everyone. We all have a different perception of perfection and what our own utopia should be like. 

               According to Pangloss life was a type of utopia whereas everything was for the best, but the question is: was it really for the best? Throughout the story Candide realizes that life is everything but perfect and starts doubting Pangloss´s views about life. When Pangloss and Candide and the rest of the group talked with the Turk they noticed it was true. Life has “three great evils, boredom, vice, and poverty.”(143) they saw that life is not as perfect as it seems and you have to recreate it to what you want it to be just like nature. Voltaire uses the Garden of Eden as a symbol just because of that, nature can be molded and shaped into what you want it to be just like life.

               For those that don’t know the story behind the Garden of Eden it is a biblical garden created by god. It is a “utopia”, God created Adam and provided him with everything even a women Eve from his own flesh, but the only thing he couldn’t do was eat the fruits from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and the tree of life. This place was paradise but one of the reasons perfection can’t exist is because no one is ever satisfied with what they have. Adam and Eve greedy and wanting more than what they had they ate the fruits of the tree and “Man was forever doomed to a life of toil and restlessness, with pressures, temptations, and adversity at every corner.” http://www.israel-a-history-of.com/biblical-garden-of-eden.html.

               What does this have to do with Candide? At the very end of the book Voltaire uses the Garden of Eden to symbolize life, because life may be paradise, but destiny is in your own hands and based on the decisions you make your life will be good or bad.

Church, Corruption, Avarice

HUMANITY: Voltaire’s main approach throughout the entire book Candide. This book is based upon the different characteristics that portray the human race. The book especially reflects upon the positive aspects that shape us into a mass of naïve and careless people. Why naïve? Some may ask. This is because most of the people expect things to happen. They expect life to be good, some believe that their destiny lies in the hands of god and I don’t want to seem disrespectful but I find that pathetic and simply naïve. I am not a religious person, so I think my destiny depends on my actions and my decisions. It’s not as if I can pray to god that I get an A on this blog entry, I have to work on it so that I can achieve that goal. Things don’t just happen. We have to make them happen.   

               Voltaire criticizes many aspects of humanity but there is one in particular that is repeatedly mentioned in the book, religion. People need something to grasp onto when life stabs them in the back, but I don’t agree with the fact that most of the people rely on faith to succeed. He doesn’t criticize religion directly but he does criticize one of the mayor institutions that enforce it, the church.

“I was an innocent little girl when you first saw me, so a friar who was my confessor had little difficulty in seducing me.”(114)

               This shows the corruption of church and clearly the way Voltaire writes about it is like if it was one of the most common things. It is a direct way of talking about the dishonesty of the church towards its principles. Aren’t the friars supposed to be abstinent? Can they be involved with a woman? They can’t or at least not in the catholic religion. That seems like corruption to me.

               I think one of the main points Voltaire wants to prove through Candide is that money brings evil upon the people.  It’s at such an extent that even the church and the religious people which are supposed to be “good” turn out to be the most greedy and envious of all.

“He realized that the lady who pretended to be Cunégonde was a fraud, that the abbé who had so rapidly taken advantage of Candide´s innocence was also a fraud, and the officer another fraud..” (108)

    “Sermons I have preached have brought me some me in a little money, though the Prior robs me of half of it; at any rate I am left enough to pay for my girls”(116)

            These here are two examples of the greediness and corruption money brought not only in common people but even in religious “holy” people. The first quote represents evil because even the abbé (priest) took advantage of Candide and tried backstabbing him with his own weaknesses (Cunégonde) just because he wanted to steal money. The little I know about the church and the people that belong to that institution is that they shouldn’t be greedy and that they shouldn’t have the need to have money. These two quotes prove that even if the doctrines of the church say they shouldn’t be that way they still were and made unholy acts that were a sign of corruption. 

Money Money Money

A theme that is constantly seen in the book is corruption and the power money has over the people. Money leads to Greed and avarice, and that changes people and turns them into selfish, unscrupulous human beings. Candide and Cacambo went to Eldorado, a place where greed didn't exist. A place as splendid that even as the sand was of gold and the pebbles were precious stones. Eldorado had more riches than the entire world, yet no one had the need to take them all.          

After their journey they left with a fortune they thought would put an end to their adversities. Riches they imagined would bribe their way out of problems and awful situations. What did this fortune bring? It only brought unhappiness because Candide had to face seeing his money disappear as a captain Vanderdendur took all the money he had left except what he had in his pockets. After this incident Candide stopped being as optimistic and started doubting Pangloss's views about life. "But it’s the truth, and I shall have to renounce that optimism of yours in the end." (86). He meets Martin a pessimistic person and makes him his companion during his journey. 
 In my opinion Voltaire thought society had become pure evil. Money had converted men into evil creatures that only cared about their individual wealth and not the wellbeing of others. Money has a huge power over the people and change the mentality of everyone. People think those who have money are the most honorable and the most educated and the most experienced and the most powerful, but that is not true. Poor people are the same as the rich, they are equally honorable and experienced, they are equally honest and maybe they don't have the best education but they are good people. Society stereotypes the poor as least and this is why everyone is constantly trying to become wealthy and this way becoming more powerful.
What has humanity become? Everything is about money, no one cares about others, and no one respects others. Day by day people become greedier, they only want money. I have even seen families fighting for money. What has love become? Isn’t love supposed to be greater than money? Life is not about the money, people cant and shouldn’t be measured by the amount of money they have because money is truly has no worth and can be lost in a matter of seconds. “You see, my friend how perishable are the riches of this world. There is nothing solid but virtue and the prospect of seeing Lady Cunegonde again.” (85) At the end of the day the only thing we have left is hope and the virtues life gave us. 

What is Happiness?

     Can you be happy if you face reality? A question I have had ever since I started reading Candide. This novel seems to be contrasting happiness and hope with reality. Voltaire in my opinion must have been a very realistic or down to earth person. He probably makes fun of the people that live in a fantasy because he was not one of them. Pangloss and Candide are two examples of these types of people. They believe everything is perfect and that their lives couldn’t be better, but finally Candide is realizing life is everything but perfect. 

        Candide´s happiness relies on his true love Lady Cunegonde and life without her is almost not worth living. He faces obstacles in life but none of them is as painful as losing his dear love. Now that he does not have her, he finally faces reality with his eyes wide open and notices it’s not as pleasant as Dr. Pangloss always said. "What would professor Pangloss say if he had seen how unsophisticated nature behaves?... All is for the best, but I must say it is very cruel to have lost lady cunegonde and to be skewered by Oreillons." (71) Now that he is finally starting to face reality he notices that he isn’t very happy because his life is full of misfortunes and not having Lady Cunegonde by his side makes everything harder to bear.

         Nothing in Candide´s life turns out right, after something good happens all that he acquires is taken away from him in a blink of an eye. He seems to be chasing his happiness but he doesn’t really know the true meaning of it. He does not realize that the more you imagine what being happy feels like, the more you distort the real image. It’s like the quote in my blog “If we had no winter, the spring would not be so pleasant; if we did not sometimes taste of adversity, prosperity would not be so welcome.” -Anne Bradstreet. The more you wait and expect for something to be the way you wanted the least it will fit your expectations only bringing disappointment.

      Happiness is a very controversial word. It has a different connotation for every single person. For some happiness might depend on wealth, for others it might mean finding true love, for others it might even turn out to be DEATH. But for Candide happiness is love and love is what gives him hope and somehow gives him a reason to continue in his journey. The problem is when he faces the truth and realizes the probability that he will be back with Cunegonde is very small he starts seeing life differently. So is he still happy now that he has faced reality? What does happiness mean to you?