Survival Manual

           The prisoner's dilemma is a model that is testing the lack of altruism existing in society. Its in our human nature always wanting more. Greed and the temptation to succeed are a part of our society today, even if your success means the failure of someone else. This model suits best the interactions between animals (reciprocal altruism, hunting, hiding etc.) because their emotions and lives in general are not as complex as ours. Although the model fits animals behaviors better that doesn't mean it doesn't resemble our own selfish behaviors. 

             An example of this is when people are in business. Businessman A proposes and idea  to the other business partners B, C and D. He obviously makes this proposal simply because he knows alone he won't be as successful as he will be with the other business men. People are generally  afraid of making mistakes, but the part they fear the most is taking the blame for those mistakes. Having other partners, in the case of a business, takes away the blame of a mistake  from YOU and puts it in the shoulders of not only businessman A but also B, C, and D. Sometimes this is comforting for people. Back to the point.. When YOU enter to business YOU want investors so that YOU can succeed and accomplish what YOU want. Sometime these investors are suckers because they may invest all their money and then they don't receive anything in return or not as much money as they first invested losing their profit and their investment. 

              Something that happened in the world not long ago was the Pyramid Scandal. In Colombia one of the major "pyramids" was called the DMG led by David Murcia Gomez with the help of others. As a very smart cheater he would convince some suckers to invest in the pyramids so that they could make a profit from their investment. The first two groups of suckers would get back all their money and much more, so when people saw that the pyramids were a good investment more and more suckers would invest trusting they would have the same destiny as the other suckers. It was a very good business because they would invest what they had and sometimes even triplicate the value of what they invested in the first place. Where did all the money come form? From all of the people who had invested, the problem with this was that there was one point when the money wouldn't be enough to repay what the suckers had invested so they eventually lost everything turning into grudgers. 

                In class we played a game that in a way demonstrated how the grudgers, the cheaters and the suckers interact just to benefit or to harm the others. If both of the students would defect they would get -0.1 so it wasn't convenient. If one defected and the other was a sucker and cooperated then the sucker would get 0 and the chatter would get 0.5 points, in this case it was convenient for the defect or the cheater but not for the sucker. Last, if both were suckers and cooperated they would both receive 0.3 points, this would benefit both but for some people that is not enough. What i noticed in class is that we are all grudgers, once someone gives us their back we do the same to them for revenge. Suckers i think are naive because most of the people wanted more points so they would be defect. Once one person say the opponent was playing defect they would start playing defect so that they wouldn't help the other win more points. I think the best strategy if you play the game for five rounds would be cooperating three times the other two the opponent would be defect and the other player cooperate and the fifth time it should be the other way around.

          What I realized from this activity is that the world is full of people that are not satisfied with what they have and with what they get so they always want more. There are very few people that don't have that mentality and that is very sad. How did society become this way? Why does the world have to be so competitive? This goes back to what Dawkins talked about at the beginning, it is all because of natural selection. We are all survival machines and what i think he means is that we do anything at our reach to survive even if that means not letting others survive or get your same equal opportunities. 

Paradoxical Altruism

One of the major topics in the book The Selfish Gene is how living organism are not honest in a way. this book is a paradox, it contradicts nature and societies' behaviors. He says people and animals are altruistic, but then contradicts that saying that every generous act humans or animals do is to get something in return. Some of the terms he uses to describe and support his theories are:

Benefits of a selfish individual: 

1. Reciprocal altruism:

"you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours"(166)

What Dawkins means by this is that animals have altruistic behaviors when they benefit their selves from it. This theory kind of resembles hypocrisy because people act a certain way not because they want to but because they find it necessary for their well being. An example of this behavior seen in our society today is the social pyramid. Some people are so desperate of becoming "popular", which is ironic because popularity doesn't mean you have true friends. Generally being popular is having fake people around you who are with you for convenience-selfish matters. Ok.. Back to the point, what i mean by this is people are trying to "succeed" socially and to achieve this they do everything at their reach like for example (cough) acting in an altruistic way (cough).  

2. Geometry for the selfish herd: 

"herd of selfish individuals"

This were the papers where W.D. Hamilton in which he stated his theory about how animals stick in with their herds to get a benefit from it. For example when a pack of lions or hyenas go hunting it is better to go in a group because the prey they catch is bigger and they are nor vulnerable to other dangers because they are in groups. This also happens in society, some people are afraid or feel vulnerable when they are alone. An example of a situation like this is when a person is being bullied. Bullies tend to attack their victims when they are alone so when their victims are in groups they don't attack them because the victim has its group to defend him/her.

The next three strategies are part of the "prisoners dilemma" whereas the temptation of having the chance to succeed out of the failure of someone else is greater than simply being equally successful or being a failure. These behaviors are unconscious and are controlled by our genes according to Maynard Smith.

3. Sucker:

suckers are those who  are willing to please everyone who is in need. Usually in real life the suckers don't succeed, they give so much without receiving that they end up with nothing. The problem is not when there are several suckers, but when there are suckers, cheaters and grudgers. The world is full of competition and everyday we see people taking advantage of the weaknesses of others. 

4. Grudger: 

Grudgers are those who keep resentment against the cheaters. They may be suckers and they give something away expecting to get something  in return, but instead they are cheated, left with nothing but bitterness. This happens many times in real life, especially in business. Some people are not to trust and so once they show you they are not reliable you immediately become bitter and stop doing businesses with those who show you they are not honest or trustworthy. Society becomes a paranoid and individualistic, since no one can trust each other.

5. Cheater: 

Cheaters receive from the suckers but don't give in return for their altruistic behavior. Usually the cheaters have a greater opportunity of succeeding in life and this is why each time more suckers and more people want to be just like the cheaters. They receive everything they want and don't have to give anything aways.

Religion's DNA

        Recently we started reading Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene, its plot is based around evolution. Not only scientific evolution but change in our knowledge. His way of writing is arrogant, he expects the reader to know most if not all the biology terms present in the book. Dawkins uses analogies to somehow explain scientific terms or events in evolution, but only he understands them. This book is almost as having biology all over again but with a bad teacher. The Selfish Gene is also a psychological study, it tries to understand why living organisms or survival machines as he calls us are altruistic.

       Through this book Dawkins is clearly trying to transmit a message that criticizes religion and society today and in the past. He contradicts religion with scientific evidence. "It is no good taking the right number of atoms and shaking them together with some external energy till they happen to fall into the right pattern, and out drops Adam."(14) Adam is a biblical character created by god put in the garden of eden where he was given everything, even Eve a women born from his flesh. Dawkins is criticizing how religion simplifies the truth. The creation of a human being is as complex as it could get, the process of meiosis during reproduction, the division of cells, the distribution of the 23 chromosomes from one parent and the 23 from the other, the fight between the dominant and the recessive alleles etc. The point is that the process is long and complex and religion prefers to say that a superior being created Adam, a perfect human being out of the blue. The message he tries to transmit  is that society is very naive, they stick to a believe that somehow isolates them from reality and the true complexity of the world.   

 
       Another example of Dawkins' critics is when he is talking about transcription, the process by which RNA molecules are produced by copying a part of the nucleotide sequence of DNA.  In other words it is when the RNA polymerase copies and translates the DNA strand into and RNA strand. If a mistake is made it can cause a lot of damage, it generates a mutation. According to Dawkins mutations can and have happened in society and cause great damage and controversy. His example is of the Septuagint  ("A Greek version of the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament), including the Apocrypha, made for Greek-speaking Jews in Egypt in the 3rd and 2nd centuries bc and adopted by the early Christian Churches"). "They mistranslated the Hebrew word for "young woman" into the greek word for "virgin", coming up with the prophecy:"Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son.." How could this be possible? All this time we could say people have been deceived, because what they thought was a miracle turned out to be a fraud. Many people still don't know this, I didn't know until I read this book  but this misconception could lead to huge controversy amongst the people all around the world. A simple mistake can cause "mutations" in society.